{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator was wrong to conclude that employee was unfairly dismissed","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employee injury, no disciplinary hearing, employer engagement of replacement"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred by ordering payment of cash in lieu of leave when not part of terms of reference","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"LR 4 and LR 5 forms, terms of reference confusion"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred by dismissing claim for underpayment despite finding employee was supervisor","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employee paid USD 180, minimum supervisor salary USD 228, 10 months underpayment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The employee was employed by the employer in a contentious position designation (house maid/receptionist vs supervisor). The employee was injured and could not attend work duties. The employer alleged the employee repudiated the contract by staying away from work and engaged a replacement. The employee alleged unfair dismissal without a hearing. The arbitrator found unfair dismissal but dismissed claims for wage arrears and underpayment, awarding cash in lieu of 28 days leave.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases