absenteeismno work no payrepudiationback-payarbitration award
Tags
unfair dismissalabsenteeismrepudiationback-pay
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether employer was liable to pay wages during period employee was not reporting for duty","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employee instructed not to report; no disciplinary action taken"}
{"issue_text":"Whether principle of \"no work no pay\" applies where employer fails to follow termination procedures","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No disciplinary hearing conducted; contract not lawfully terminated"}
{"issue_text":"Whether employee's absenteeism constituted repudiation of contract","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Employee ceased reporting; obtained alternative employment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Respondent employee alleged he was instructed not to report for duty from January 2009, later obtained employment elsewhere in September 2009, and successfully claimed back-pay through arbitration for the intervening period.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases