Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Sikanyisiwe Phiri v Brighton Ndone and Simangaliso Murungi and Edmore Makonese and Legion Majahanda and Registrar of Deeds and NMB Bank and The Registrar General

HH 486-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
29 August 2025
Citation
HH 486-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 486
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Chitapi J
Full Bench
Chitapi J
Areas of Law
Property LawPrescriptionDeclaratory Relief
Keywords
prescriptiondeclaraturdeed of transferfraudulent transfernullityimmovable property
Tags
prescriptiondeclaratory orderfraudulent transferimmovable propertynullity
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
  • High Court Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Does a declaratur prescribe under the Prescription Act?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claim filed more than 3 years after discovery of alleged fraud"}
  • {"issue_text":"Has the plea of prescription been validly taken in this matter?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Underlying causa is alleged fraudulent transfer"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff, registered owner of immovable property under deed of transfer No 4498/98, discovered in April 2015 that her property had been fraudulently transferred to the fourth and fifth defendants under deed of transfer No 715/15 dated 29 April 2015. She filed a claim on 1 September 2021 seeking declaratory relief. The fourth and fifth defendants raised a special plea of prescription, arguing the claim was time-barred under s 15(d) of the Prescription Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →