{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitration award should be set aside for failure to keep proper record of proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator heard viva voce evidence but kept no record"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the counter-application filed by 1st respondent was competent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Counter-application filed via opposing affidavit instead of Form 29"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitration award is contrary to public policy for enforcing sale of non-existent land","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Land never formally subdivided, no diagrams approved"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the award is a brutum fulmen incapable of enforcement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award lacks specific operative order"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the award unreasonably interferes with contractual terms","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award renders rights of first refusal nugatory"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to set aside an arbitration award concerning a land sale agreement where the arbitrator found that Unki Mines purchased the entire subdivision rather than 1,266 individual stands. The dispute arose over whether the sale covered individual stands or the whole subdivision after the original layout plan was found to be invalid.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases