{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding jurisdiction over the matter","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Secondment from Shomet Engineering to Shomet Construction"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in ordering reinstatement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Termination by Shomet Construction"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator properly determined unlawful dismissal","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Employment relationship status"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was employed as a gate guard by Shomet Engineering, was dismissed, reinstated through conciliation, then seconded to Shomet Construction which subsequently terminated his employment. The arbitrator found the termination unlawful and ordered reinstatement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases