Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Shepherd Murahwi and Deborah Murahwi and Peter Sigauke and Ozwell C. Masara and Grace Masara and Edmore Mukakavari and Tapiwa T. Mukakavari v Ms Magwenzi and Arrosum Construction (Pvt) Ltd and Divine Homes (Pvt) Ltd and Nicanor Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd and The September Trust

HH 203-10

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
25 August 2010
Citation
HH 203-10
Neutral Citation
[2010] ZWHH 203
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
Bere J
Full Bench
Bere J
Areas of Law
Property lawInterdicts
Keywords
Interim interdictProperty interferenceStand developmentHelensvale Township
Tags
InterdictProperty disputeInterim relief
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • x
  • c
  • l
  • u
  • s
  • i
  • v
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • ;
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • o
  • r
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • i
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • r
  • u
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • s
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • d
  • a
  • n
  • y
  • w
  • h
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicants have satisfied requirements for interim interdict","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants allege interference with their purchased stands"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the interim interdict should bind third, fourth and fifth respondents","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All three respondents have interest in the properties"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants purchased stands in Helensvale Township which are being interfered with by the respondents. The third respondent has advertised for sale of some of the stands, and the fifth respondent has recently expressed interest in the property through an application for joinder.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →