divorceconsent papercivil imprisonmentsubstituted servicepersonal service
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Rules, 2021
High Court Rules, 2021
High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether substituted service of civil imprisonment summons should be permitted where personal service has not been effected","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant unable to serve respondent personally at workplace; parties involved in separate litigation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Parties signed a consent paper in divorce proceedings whereby respondent agreed to pay applicant USD1200 within 12 months. A decree of divorce was granted incorporating the consent paper. Respondent failed to pay, applicant issued civil imprisonment summons but could not personally serve respondent at his workplace. Applicant sought substituted service at workplace and respondent's lawyers in another matter.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases