Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Shapton Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd t/a Newbase v Mimosa Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd & Vimbai Nyemba N.O.

HH 132-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
1 March 2017
Citation
HH 132-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 132
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Tagu J
Full Bench
Tagu J
Areas of Law
Arbitration lawContract law
Keywords
Setting aside arbitral awardPublic policyContract terminationNotice period
Tags
ArbitrationContract terminationService agreement
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
  • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
  • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application to set aside the arbitral award was filed within the three-month period prescribed by Article 34(3) of the Model Law","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Date of receipt of arbitral award"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be set aside on public policy grounds","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses 7.1 and 10.1"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant and first respondent entered into a Services Agreement in 2009 for a fixed term ending 31 October 2015. The first respondent terminated the agreement in May 2014 under clause 7(1) giving one month's notice. The applicant initially accepted termination but later disputed it, claiming breach of contract. The dispute was referred to arbitration where the arbitrator dismissed the claim. The applicant sought to set aside the arbitral award on public policy grounds.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →