arbitral awardsetting asidepublic policyscope of submissionarbitrationmining contract
Tags
arbitrationcommercial disputemining agreementarbitral award
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act
Arbitration Act
Arbitration Act
Prescription Act
Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Act
Finance (No. 2) Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator exceed his mandate by deciding matters beyond submission scope?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Penalty calculation method, rehabilitation order, costs apportionment"}
{"issue_text":"Does the arbitral award violate Zimbabwe's public policy?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Prescription ruling, penalty awards, costs allocation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
San He Mining sought to set aside portions of an arbitral award concerning chrome mining and processing agreement disputes with Zimasco, claiming the arbitrator exceeded his mandate and the award violated public policy.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases