Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

San He Mining Zimbabwe (Private) Limited v Zimasco (Private) Limited and Another

HH 28-24

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
19 January 2024
Citation
HH 28-24
Neutral Citation
[2024] ZWHH 28
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Mafusire J
Full Bench
Mafusire J
Areas of Law
Arbitration LawCommercial LawMining Law
Keywords
arbitral awardsetting asidepublic policyscope of submissionarbitrationmining contract
Tags
arbitrationcommercial disputemining agreementarbitral award
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Arbitration Act
  • Arbitration Act
  • Arbitration Act
  • Prescription Act
  • Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Act
  • Finance (No. 2) Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator exceed his mandate by deciding matters beyond submission scope?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Penalty calculation method, rehabilitation order, costs apportionment"}
  • {"issue_text":"Does the arbitral award violate Zimbabwe's public policy?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Prescription ruling, penalty awards, costs allocation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

San He Mining sought to set aside portions of an arbitral award concerning chrome mining and processing agreement disputes with Zimasco, claiming the arbitrator exceeded his mandate and the award violated public policy.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →