Agreement of SaleBreachOccupationRentalsDamagesCosts
Tags
Agreement of SaleBreach of ContractDamagesUnlawful Occupation
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
s
w
e
r
e
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
l
y
c
i
t
e
d
o
r
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
c
o
u
r
t
r
e
l
i
e
d
e
n
t
i
r
e
l
y
o
n
c
o
m
m
o
n
l
a
w
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
o
f
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
l
a
w
a
n
d
c
a
s
e
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
s
.
#
#
#
O
T
H
E
R
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
T
I
E
S
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Was the appellant in breach of the agreement of sale?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Failure to pay balance by due date; taking occupation before full payment"}
{"issue_text":"Was the rental rate of $350 per month justified?","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Evidence of $50 per room per month for 7 rooms"}
{"issue_text":"Did the appellant take occupation lawfully?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Occupation before full payment; eviction of tenants"}
{"issue_text":"Was the award of costs on attorney-client scale justified?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's intransigence and lack of bona fide defense"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant purchased a property from the respondent for $15,000, paid $13,000 deposit, failed to pay the $2,000 balance by 30 June 2012, took occupation without consent, and refused to pay rentals. The respondent claimed the balance and rentals. The appellant admitted owing $2,500 but contested the rental claim. The lower court granted judgment for the respondent, leading to this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases