evictionprescriptionagreement of salebreach of contract
legislation
Statutes Cited
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
Contractual Penalties Act
Contractual Penalties Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim for eviction had prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claim filed 1 November 2016, 60-month payment period ended February 2007"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff followed proper cancellation procedures under Contractual Penalties Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No evidence of written notice served on defendants"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Plaintiff sought eviction of defendants from property sold under instalment agreement dated 11 February 2002. Defendants paid deposit and some instalments but stopped paying. Plaintiff sold property to third parties without cancelling agreement. Defendants raised prescription as defence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases