unlawful job actiongo slowStatutory Instrument 165 of 1992incitementmisconduct
Tags
misconductdismissalgo-slowincitement
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] (underlying enabling Act – not expressly cited but governs labour disciplinary regime)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Appeals Committee seriously misdirected itself in finding appellant guilty of misconduct on the basis of Makanyire’s evidence","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Sole testimony of Obert Makanyire; appellant’s failure to challenge evidence; low production on 22 November 2012"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant, a supervisor, was dismissed for allegedly inciting subordinates to engage in a go-slow on 22 November 2012 by instructing them to “work low low.” After domestic remedies were exhausted, he appealed to the Labour Court claiming insufficient evidence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases