Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Rufaro Marketing v Rufaro Marketing Workers Union

LC/H/34/16

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
22 January 2016
Citation
LC/H/34/16
Neutral Citation
[2016] ZWLC 34
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Mhuri J
Full Bench
Mhuri J
Areas of Law
Labour LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
rescissiondefault judgmentnotice of set downservice irregularity
Tags
rescission of default judgmentlabour appealservice of notice
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Was the rescission application filed within the 30-day period prescribed by Rule 33?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant became aware on 5 June 2015, filed on 14 July 2015"}
  • {"issue_text":"Was applicant in wilful default?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Notice served on wrong law firm"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Applicant filed an appeal against an arbitral award in 2011. The appeal was set down for hearing in February 2014 but applicant failed to appear, resulting in a default judgment. Applicant only became aware of the default when the Sheriff attached its property in June 2015 and filed this rescission application in July 2015.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →