Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Rosemary Nyahuye (In her capacity as the Executrix Dative of the Estate of Late Farayi Benjamin Njiwah (DR 4397/99)) replaced by Richard Manwick Dhaka v Leo Electrical (Private) Limited & The Master of the High Court

SC 11/23

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
31 January 2023
Citation
SC 11/23
Neutral Citation
[2023] ZWSC 11
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
UCHENA JA
Author
CHIWESHE JA
Full Bench
UCHENA JACHIWESHE JACHATUKUTA JA
Areas of Law
Property LawContract LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Agreement of SaleCancellationPrescriptionEjectmentBreach of Contract
Tags
Property LawContract of SalePrescription
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in refusing to grant absolution from the instance","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Prescription was raised during trial"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in failing to find that the plaintiff's claim had prescribed","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Six-year delay between 2006 and 2012; prescription raised during trial"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in finding that the appellant's witness lacked locus standi","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Richard Manwick Dhaka replaced original appellant"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in holding that the agreement was lawfully cancelled","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Breach of clauses 3 and 4; notice given; termination on 25 September 2012"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant, as executrix of the estate of the late Benjamin Njiwah, appealed against the High Court's confirmation of cancellation of an agreement of sale for immovable property and order for ejectment, after the deceased had breached payment terms and the respondent claimed the claim had prescribed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →