{"issue_text":"Whether an arbitrator can quantify damages for loss of employment without hearing oral evidence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator awarded 24 months damages based only on submissions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether back pay can be awarded when reinstatement order is effective from a specific future date without retrospective provision","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Reinstatement from 7 November 2014, no order for back pay from earlier date"}
{"issue_text":"Whether a labour consultant has locus standi to represent a party at arbitration","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent represented by consultant T Ndoro at arbitration"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against an arbitral award that awarded the respondent US$36,284 in damages for unfair dismissal, including 24 months damages for loss of employment and back pay for 28 months. The appellant challenged the quantification on three grounds: failure to hear evidence, improper award of back pay, and locus standi of the consultant who represented the respondent.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases