Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Rolex (Pvt) Ltd v Alice Ndhlela

[2016] ZWLC 652

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
21 October 2016
Citation
[2016] ZWLC 652
Judgment No.
LC/H/652/2016
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
R.F. Manyangadze J
Full Bench
R.F. Manyangadze J
Areas of Law
Labour LawArbitrationDamages Quantification
Keywords
unfair dismissalarbitral awarddamages for loss of employmentback paylocus standiconsultant representation
Tags
arbitral awarddamages quantificationreinstatementback paylocus standi
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether an arbitrator can quantify damages for loss of employment without hearing oral evidence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator awarded 24 months damages based only on submissions"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether back pay can be awarded when reinstatement order is effective from a specific future date without retrospective provision","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Reinstatement from 7 November 2014, no order for back pay from earlier date"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether a labour consultant has locus standi to represent a party at arbitration","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent represented by consultant T Ndoro at arbitration"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant appealed against an arbitral award that awarded the respondent US$36,284 in damages for unfair dismissal, including 24 months damages for loss of employment and back pay for 28 months. The appellant challenged the quantification on three grounds: failure to hear evidence, improper award of back pay, and locus standi of the consultant who represented the respondent.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →