{"issue_text":"Whether custody should be awarded to defendant with plaintiff having reasonable access","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Children's injuries, care arrangements, parental suitability"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Mercedes Benz AEA 9324 constitutes matrimonial property subject to sharing","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Purchase date, financing, registration, use during marriage"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant should be awarded house No. 64 Buena Vista","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Purchase date, state at purchase, defendant's contributions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in December 2011 and had two minor children. The plaintiff sought divorce on grounds of irretrievable breakdown and claimed custody of children and property distribution. The marriage broke down and parties separated in 2017. Key disputes centered on custody of minor children and whether certain properties (Mercedes Benz and house No. 64 Buena Vista) constituted matrimonial property subject to distribution.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases