constitutional matterSupreme Court appealevictiontrust propertyabuse of processcosts
Tags
constitutional jurisdictionappeal from Supreme Courtevictionpersons with disabilitiesabuse of court process
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear a direct appeal from the Supreme Court where no constitutional issue was determined by the Supreme Court","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No constitutional issue was raised in Supreme Court proceedings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants, all persons with permanent physical disabilities, occupied property administered by the respondent trust. After relations soured, the trust sought their eviction. The High Court ruled against the trust, but the Supreme Court overturned this decision and upheld the eviction. The appellants then purported to appeal to the Constitutional Court claiming a constitutional violation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases