sexual harassmentprescriptionarbitrationdamageslabour disputedelict
Tags
sexual harassmentprescriptionarbitrationlabour dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
Prescription Act
Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether submission of sexual harassment dispute to arbitration interrupted running of prescription on claim for delictual damages","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator found sexual harassment in March 2014; damages claim filed June 2014"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant claimed damages for sexual harassment by the first respondent between September 2002 and June 2003 while employed by the second respondent. After her dismissal, she pursued the matter through arbitration which found in her favour in March 2014. She then instituted High Court proceedings for damages in June 2014. The High Court upheld a prescription plea, finding the claim had prescribed by 2003.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases