share sale agreementarticles of associationshareholder consentrectification of company register
Tags
company lawshare transferrectification of register
legislation
Statutes Cited
Companies and Other Business Entities Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the sale of shares agreement between Takaona and Mavetera was valid despite lack of prior written consent of all shareholders","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Articles of association requirement; consent document signed after agreement; Takaona's evidence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the lower court misdirected itself in finding that no corrective measures were taken to nullify the agreement","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Extra-ordinary meeting convened; evidence of ratification through conduct"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the joinder of 1st and 2nd appellants in their personal capacities was proper","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Ground abandoned at hearing"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Mavetera bought 40% shares in Purple Dot from Takaona. Appellants refused to register the transfer claiming the sale required prior written consent of all shareholders per company articles. Magistrate's Court ordered rectification of register to show Mavetera as 40% shareholder. Appellants appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases