{"issue_text":"Whether the marriage between the parties had irretrievably broken down to such an extent that a normal relationship could not be restored.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Long-term lack of communication, separate living, no intimacy since 2005, plaintiff’s lack of love"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff was obliged to pay maintenance for the defendant and if so, in what amount.","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant’s employability, plaintiff’s income, defendant’s financial needs"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff was obliged to maintain the Mazda 626 vehicle awarded to the defendant.","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Asset distribution agreement, plaintiff’s offer, defendant’s possession"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in 1983 and had three children, all of whom were adults at the time of trial. They had lived separately within the same home for two years before the plaintiff moved out over nine months prior to trial. The plaintiff sought divorce, custody of the minor child, and equitable distribution of assets, most of which had been settled pre-trial. The trial focused on whether the marriage had irretrievably broken down, whether maintenance should be awarded, and whether the plaintiff must maintain a vehicle awarded to the defendant.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases