Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Reverend Clifford Nunu Ndlovu v La Fontaine College and Oswell Madya

HH 330-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
26 May 2022
Citation
HH 330-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 330
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
TSANGA J
Full Bench
TSANGA JMAXWELL J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureCommercial Litigation
Keywords
summary judgmentspecial plealis pendensgenerator leaseprocedural compliance
Tags
summary judgmentspecial plealis pendensprocedural irregularity
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • Rule 6(4) is triggered only if the plaintiff’s summary-judgment application is already on record when the special plea is filed.
  • {'verbatim': None}
  • Rule 6(3): “If no application by the plaintiff for summary judgment has been made, either party may, on seven days’ notice, set down such special plea for hearing before the trial.”
  • Rule 6(4): “If an application by the plaintiff for summary judgment has been made, a special plea shall, if particulars thereof have been delivered before the hearing of such application, be heard and determined at the hearing of such application.”
  • Rule 7(c): “failing such consent and such application, the party pleading specially … shall within a further period of 48 hours plead over to the merits … and the special plea … shall not be set down for hearing the trial.”
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether a special plea filed before a summary judgment application can be heard with that application if not properly set down","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Special plea filed one month before summary judgment application; special plea not set down within prescribed time"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court below erred in finding the claims were lis pendens","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Two cases involving same generator; different prayers in each case"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant claimed US$750 for the value of a generator leased to respondents. He applied for summary judgment after respondents filed a special plea of lis pendens. The court below upheld the special plea and dismissed the summary judgment application.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →