{"issue_text":"Whether an employment relationship exists between applicant and respondents","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Six-year absence of work and pay; respondents' refusal of re-engagement conditions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondents are lawfully occupying the applicant's properties","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Continued occupation without consent; notices to vacate served"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant is entitled to rei vindicatio remedy","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Ownership of houses; occupation without consent"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, successor-in-title to Old Nic Mine, sought eviction of 54 former employees who refused to accept re-engagement conditions in 2016 and continued occupying company houses without working or receiving pay for six years. The respondents claimed ongoing employment relationship and lawful occupation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases