{"issue_text":"Whether non-compliance with Rule 62(5) regarding submission of record of proceedings warrants dismissal of review application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Late submission of record; uncertified record; wrong party submitted record"}
{"issue_text":"Whether preliminary objection should be taken where defect can be cured by adjournment","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Record already before court; defects could be remedied"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought review of the Minister's decision to withdraw cancellation notices for mining certificates. The third respondent raised a preliminary objection that the record of proceedings was filed late, by the wrong party, and was uncertified, violating Rule 62(5) of the High Court Rules.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases