{"issue_text":"Whether or not ACL submitted the application for the registration of Ramatex’s blocked funds on or before the 30 April 2019 deadline","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Submission date of application; NMB’s confirmation; RBZ reference number"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the registration of the legacy debt failed as a result of the late submission of the application or due to the failure to meet the RBZ’s registration criteria","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Absence of bills of entry; RBZ rejection reason; re-submission in August 2019"}
{"issue_text":"Whether ACL is liable to pay damages in the sum of US$998,960.00","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Timeliness of submission; cause of failure; duty to provide documents"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Ramatex SA, a Swiss company, had US$998,960.00 deposited in a collection account with African Century Limited (ACL) in Zimbabwe, which was classified as blocked funds. Ramatex instructed ACL to register the funds as a legacy debt with the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) before the 30 April 2019 deadline. Ramatex claimed the application failed due to late submission by ACL, while ACL argued it submitted the application on time through NMB Bank but it failed due to missing documentation, particularly bills of entry.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases