real estate agentcommissionmandate to sellspecific performancebreach
Tags
estate agent commissionmandate agreementspecific performancebreach of contract
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
s
w
e
r
e
c
i
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant fulfilled its mandate entitling it to commission","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Introduction of purchaser, terms of mandate, sale conclusion"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent breached the mandate agreement","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Acceptance of lower offer, use of other agents"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant estate agent claimed US$20,037.50 commission alleging it introduced a purchaser who bought respondent's property. Respondent denied liability, asserting applicant failed to perform under a non-exclusive mandate and did not secure an acceptable offer.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases