Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act No. 20 of 2013
Interpretation Act
Insolvency Act
Companies Act
Companies and Other Business Entities Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether s 126(1)(e) Insolvency Act applies retrospectively to override existing court order","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Extant court order HC 10095/14; new Insolvency Act provisions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether security deposit constitutes trust money exempt from leave requirement","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Security deposit paid under lease; defendant holds as trustee"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Plaintiff sued defendant for recovery of US$850,000 security deposit. Defendant is under judicial management with an extant court order requiring leave before any action. Defendant raised special plea that plaintiff failed to seek leave. Plaintiff argued new Insolvency Act provisions exempt trust funds from leave requirement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases