{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator have jurisdiction to hear the matter?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator Ndomene's appointment status"}
{"issue_text":"Was the citation of parties proper?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"\"Abisha Chiremba and others\" citation"}
{"issue_text":"Had the claims prescribed under section 94(1) of the Labour Act?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claims from 2012 referred in 2016"}
{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator err in finding SI 50/2012 created ascertainable liability?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Unregistered previous arbitral awards"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Nine employees claimed underpayment and non-payment of allowances from 2012-2014 while employed on fixed-term contracts. The appellant disputed the claims on grounds of prescription and improper citation, and challenged the arbitrator's jurisdiction.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases