Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Pondai Mushambadope v Champion Constructors (Pvt) Ltd and The Registrar of Deeds

HH 288-12

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
11 July 2012
Citation
HH 288-12
Neutral Citation
[2012] ZWHH 288
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
BHUNU J
Full Bench
BHUNU J
Areas of Law
Property LawInterdicts
Keywords
property disputeinterdicttransfer of propertyimprovements
Tags
interdictproperty transferspecific performance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • m
  • p
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • P
  • r
  • o
  • c
  • e
  • d
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • I
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • g
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 6
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • A
  • r
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • l
  • e
  • 6
  • J
  • u
  • r
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 4
  • P
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • E
  • v
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 4
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 8
  • S
  • u
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether to grant an interdict preventing improvements on the property pending resolution of HC 3885/12","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Improvements being carried out; applicant has paid purchase price; respondents deny receiving payment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant purchased immovable property from the first respondent and paid the full purchase price through a law firm. The respondents deny receiving payment and refuse to transfer the property. The applicant sought an interdict to prevent further developments on the property pending resolution of a specific performance claim in HC 3885/12.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →