{"issue_text":"Whether court a quo erred in granting summary judgment where triable issue of illegality was raised","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defence of illegal foreign currency exchange"}
{"issue_text":"Whether court a quo erred in pronouncing on in pari delicto rule not raised by parties","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Court's own motion relaxation of in pari delicto"}
{"issue_text":"Whether court a quo erred in finding Smith personally liable for Polomo's debts","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Smith acted as director of Polomo"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Tillcorp claimed US$42,000 from Polomo and its director Smith alleging breach of a verbal agreement to remit money. Polomo defended on basis the agreement was an illegal foreign currency exchange. Magistrates Court granted summary judgment. Polomo and Smith appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases