{"issue_text":"Whether a disciplinary committee without the required two employee representatives has lawful authority to conduct disciplinary proceedings","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Disciplinary panel proceeded without employee representatives; workers committee refused to co-operate"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicants waived their right to challenge the disciplinary panel by boycotting hearings","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicants boycotted hearings; workers committee refused to co-operate"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicants were dismissed by respondent after a collective job action. They challenged their dismissal on review, particularly arguing that the disciplinary committee was improperly constituted as it lacked the required two employee representatives from the workers committee.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases