{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award is contrary to public policy of Zimbabwe","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award ordered payment for water rights on acquired land; respondent occupied land unlawfully"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the award rewards a criminal enterprise","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent continued occupying gazetted land without lawful authority"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the underlying contract was void for illegality","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract concluded after land acquisition; respondent had no legal rights to land"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant sought to set aside an arbitral award ordering it to pay USD 3 000 monthly to respondent for water rights from a dam built on land acquired by the State in 2001. Respondent continued occupying the land without lawful authority after acquisition.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases