{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant's claim is prescribed?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Complaint made 10 April 2024; suspension 6 January 2021"}
{"issue_text":"Whether prayer for reinstatement without alternative for damages is competent?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Draft order prayed only reinstatement"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant proved he was suspended by respondent?","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Suspension letter on respondent letterhead at page 11"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant was employed as Stores Controller by respondent, suspended on 6 January 2021 pending misconduct investigations that never materialised. After various NEC proceedings and a prior Labour Court remittal, he appealed against the Designated Agent's 20 June 2025 finding that he had not proved his suspension.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases