unlawful arrest and detentionspecial pleaprescriptionPolice Act section 70
Tags
unlawful arrestprescriptionPolice Actspecial plea
legislation
Statutes Cited
Police Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
State Liabilities Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the plea of prescription was properly raised as a special plea","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Defendants raised prescription in plea under heading \"IN LIMINE\""}
{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff's claim has prescribed in terms of section 70 of the Police Act","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Cause of action arose 26 August 2016, summons served 16 November 2017"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff was arrested by police on 26 August 2016 and acquitted on 22 March 2017. He issued summons for damages for unlawful arrest and detention on 30 October 2017 and served them on 16 November 2017. The defendants raised a special plea of prescription in terms of section 70 of the Police Act, which requires civil proceedings to be commenced within eight months after the cause of action arose.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases