Rule 238 (2a)Heads of argumentAutomatic barProcedural non-compliance
Tags
Civil procedureHigh Court RulesHeads of argument
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
2
0
,
r
3
.
2
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
,
s
7
5
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
f
o
r
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
,
s
3
3
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
,
s
6
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
r
t
6
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent was automatically barred for failure to file heads of argument within 10 days as required by Rule 238 (2a)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Late filing of respondent's heads on 8 July 2013"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant filed and served his heads of argument on 25 July 2012. The respondent failed to file his heads within the 10-day period prescribed by Rule 238 (2a) of the High Court Rules, only doing so on 8 July 2013. The hearing was set for 16 July 2013.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases