Deed of settlementConsent orderCurrency conversionInterbank rateSI 33 of 2019Judgment debt
Tags
Banking & FinanceDebt RecoveryCurrency ConversionConsent Order
legislation
Statutes Cited
Exchange Control Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the deed of settlement and consent order constituted a new cause of action requiring payment at prevailing interbank rate","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Deed executed on 20 May 2019, three months after SI 33 effective date"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants sold farming machinery to the first respondent in 2014, with the second respondent as surety. When payment defaulted, the appellants sued and the parties entered into a deed of settlement on 20 May 2019, resulting in a consent order for payment of US$226,000. The respondents made payments in RTGS dollars at 1:1 rate, claiming this satisfied the debt, while appellants argued payment should be at interbank rate.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases