Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Penniwill (Private) Limited v The Trustees for the Time Being of Gabriel and Angels Trust and 7 Others

[2022] ZWHH 505

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
16 February 2022
Citation
[2022] ZWHH 505
Judgment No.
HH 505-21
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
Tagu J
Full Bench
Tagu J
Areas of Law
Property LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
InterdictExecution pending appealConstruction activitiesAccess rightsUrgent chamber application
Tags
InterdictExecution pending appealConstruction disputeAccess rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • e
  • x
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • s
  • s
  • l
  • y
  • q
  • u
  • o
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • ;
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the answering affidavit is improperly before the court in an urgent chamber application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent filed written notice of opposition, applicant filed answering affidavit"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the matter is urgent given the time elapsed since the initial application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Three months elapsed since initial application, 29 days since judgment"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there was non-disclosure of material facts","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondents claim applicant did not disclose how vehicular issues arise"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the relief sought is competent in an urgent chamber application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Relief not in Form 26 or 26(a), seeks final relief on urgent basis"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether leave to execute judgment pending appeal should be granted","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appeal noted by respondents, potential irreparable harm to applicant"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant obtained an interdict against respondents stopping construction activities and requiring restoration of access to certain stands. Instead of complying, the first and second respondents noted an appeal to the Supreme Court, which suspended the judgment. The applicant then filed this urgent application for leave to execute the judgment pending the appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →