{"issue_text":"Whether clause 10.3 of the motor vehicle policy obliges the defendants to sell the Toyota Fortuner motor vehicle to the plaintiff","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's 2 year 10 month usage period, vehicle not reaching 3-year disposal period"}
{"issue_text":"If issue 1 is affirmative, whether plaintiff is entitled to damages should defendant fail to sell the vehicle","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Plaintiff's claim for vehicle purchase"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant should pay plaintiff's costs","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Overall conduct of litigation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff, a former employee, sought to compel her former employer and its successor company to sell her the Toyota Fortuner vehicle she had been allocated during employment, relying on clause 10.3 of the motor vehicle policy. The defendants refused to sell the vehicle despite the plaintiff meeting the 1.5-year usage requirement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases