Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Parks and Wildlife Management Authority and Minister of Environment, Climate Change Tourism and Hospitality v Suscaden Investments (Private) Limited and Big Five Safaris (Private) Limited and Parks and Wildlife Management Authority

HH 192-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
21 March 2025
Citation
HH 192-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 192
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Chitapi J
Full Bench
Chitapi J
Areas of Law
Administrative LawProperty LawStatutory Interpretation
Keywords
lease agreementministerial concurrencenullityParks and Wildlife Actstatutory condition precedent
Tags
lease agreementministerial consentstatutory compliancewildlife management
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Parks and Wildlife Management Act [Chapter 20:14]
  • Parks and Wildlife Management Act [Chapter 20:14]
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the lease agreement is valid without ministerial concurrence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Minister denied signing; agreement explicitly required ministerial concurrence"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the agreement's duration exceeding 25 years renders it invalid","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Agreement duration was 25 years 3.5 months"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants sought a declaration that a 2017 lease agreement between Parks and Wildlife Management Authority and Suscaden Investments was null and void for lack of ministerial concurrence as required by statute. The agreement covered 3 square kilometers in Chewore North Safari Area plus an additional 40 square kilometers. The Minister denied signing the agreement, while Suscaden claimed she had signed it.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →