{"issue_text":"Whether the application was filed within the 30-day time limit under Article 16(3)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application filed 6 April 2018, award dated 5 March 2018"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding the adjudicator lacked jurisdiction","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator dismissed adjudicator's award despite finding procedural jurisdiction"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator could dismiss applicant's claims after finding lack of jurisdiction","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator dismissed claims rather than merely declining jurisdiction"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant contracted to supply and install electrical plant for first respondent's housing project in Shurugwi. When applicant claimed compensation for delays caused by first respondent's failure to make infrastructure ready, the adjudicator upheld the claim. First respondent issued notice of dissatisfaction, leading to arbitration where the arbitrator ruled he had jurisdiction but the adjudicator did not, and dismissed applicant's claims.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases