rescissiondefault judgmentwilful defaultacknowledgement of debtfraud allegationsdirty hands doctrine
Tags
rescission of judgmentdefault judgmentwilful defaultacknowledgement of debt
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
(
E
C
H
R
)
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
6
8
P
a
r
o
l
e
B
o
a
r
d
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
0
4
P
r
i
s
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
5
2
P
r
i
s
o
n
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
9
9
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
O
f
f
e
n
d
e
r
s
A
c
t
1
9
7
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
O
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
4
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
D
i
s
o
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
P
o
w
e
r
s
o
f
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
C
o
u
r
t
s
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
2
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
3
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
4
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
5
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
6
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
7
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
8
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
9
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
0
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
1
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
2
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
3
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
4
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
5
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
6
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
7
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
8
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
1
9
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
.
2
0
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether an order rescinding a default judgment is appealable","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent alleged fraud in obtaining default judgment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the application for rescission was filed out of time","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application filed 2 months 23 days after knowledge of judgment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent complied with Order 30 Rule 1(3) requiring payment into court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No evidence of payment into court"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent approached court with dirty hands","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent lied in affidavits about service and attendance"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent was in wilful default","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent chose not to attend on 1 June 2011 after attending on 24 May"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent had bona fide defence","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent's inconsistent explanations and forged signature allegations"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant obtained default judgment against respondent for US$18,716.06 based on an acknowledgement of debt. Respondent successfully applied for rescission alleging non-service and fraud. Appellant appealed both the finding that the order was appealable and the merits of the rescission.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases