{"issue_text":"Does the applicant have locus standi to bring this constitutional challenge under section 85(1)(d) of the Constitution?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant is legal practitioner not directly affected by instrument; instrument affects bankers and traders"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a legal practitioner, challenged the constitutionality of Statutory Instrument 127 of 2021, which was promulgated by the President. The Minister of Finance and Economic Development opposed the application, arguing that the applicant lacked locus standi as he had no direct or substantial interest in the matter.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases