Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

O.K. Zimbabwe v Sabina Ndoreka

[2014] ZWLC 508

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
19 June 2014
Citation
[2014] ZWLC 508
Judgment No.
LC/H/508/14
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
L. Hove J
Full Bench
L. Hove J
Areas of Law
Labour lawUnfair dismissalDisciplinary proceedings
Keywords
Till controllerStock shrinkageUnsatisfactory performanceDisciplinary hearingNegotiating Committee
Tags
Disciplinary hearingMisconductAppeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 0
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • 3
  • ,
  • 5
  • ,
  • 6
  • ,
  • 1
  • 4
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • M
  • u
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • (
  • A
  • b
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • D
  • e
  • a
  • t
  • h
  • P
  • e
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • t
  • y
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 5
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 7
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • o
  • l
  • e
  • B
  • o
  • a
  • r
  • d
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
  • /
  • 5
  • 7
  • 4
  • )
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • o
  • l
  • e
  • B
  • o
  • a
  • r
  • d
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • /
  • 4
  • 5
  • 3
  • )
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • /
  • 7
  • 2
  • 8
  • )
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 2
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 0
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • 3
  • ,
  • 5
  • ,
  • 6
  • ,
  • 1
  • 4
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • M
  • u
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • (
  • A
  • b
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • D
  • e
  • a
  • t
  • h
  • P
  • e
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • t
  • y
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 5
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 7
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • o
  • l
  • e
  • B
  • o
  • a
  • r
  • d
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
  • /
  • 5
  • 7
  • 4
  • )
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • o
  • l
  • e
  • B
  • o
  • a
  • r
  • d
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • /
  • 4
  • 5
  • 3
  • )
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • (
  • S
  • I
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • /
  • 7
  • 2
  • 8
  • )
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 2
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Negotiating Committee erred in finding that the employer failed to prove allegations of unsatisfactory performance","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employee's failure to supervise till operations, stock shrinkage, evidence of goods leaving without payment"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the employee's refusal to attend disciplinary hearing constituted waiver of rights","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Employee refused to attend hearing despite proper notice"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether hearsay evidence can be relied upon in Labour Court","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Evidence from till operators about goods leaving without payment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant employed the respondent as a Till Controller at its Kwekwe Branch. She was charged with unsatisfactory performance related to stock shrinkage of 6.18% against permissible 0.5%, specifically failing to ensure proper scanning and payment of goods. She was found guilty and dismissed but successfully challenged the dismissal before the Local Joint Committee and Negotiating Committee, which reversed the dismissal decision.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →