rapelegal penetrationmedical affidavitminor complainantbenefit of doubt
Tags
rapeminorpenetrationmedical evidence
legislation
Statutes Cited
None cited
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether there was sufficient evidence of legal penetration to sustain rape conviction","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Medical report showed no penetration; complainant alleged slight penetration; inconsistencies in complainant's evidence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the sentence of 15 years imprisonment was excessive","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant was 20 years old; complainant was 9 years old; effective sentence was 15 years from 18 with 3 suspended"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, aged 20, was convicted of raping a 9-year-old girl and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. He appealed against both conviction and sentence, arguing that the medical affidavit showed no penetration and the complainant's evidence was inconsistent regarding the location and occurrence of rape.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases