Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondents have the constitutional obligation to initiate legislation actualizing section 106(3)","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Section 106(3) unimplemented for 8 years; respondents are Cabinet members"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has locus standi to bring this application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant is law student interested in constitutional compliance"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the non-joinder of Cabinet/Parliament is fatal to the application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondents raised preliminary point on non-joinder"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
A law student applied for a mandamus order compelling the Minister of Justice and the Attorney-General to initiate legislation giving effect to section 106(3) of the Constitution, which requires an Act of Parliament to prescribe a code of conduct for Vice-Presidents, Ministers and Deputy-Ministers. The provision had remained unimplemented for eight years since the constitution's enactment in 2013.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases