Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

NMB Bank Limited v Wordhouse Multimedia Services (Private) Limited

HH 218-11

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
19 October 2011
Citation
HH 218-11
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 218
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
MTSHIYA J
Full Bench
MTSHIYA J
Areas of Law
Banking LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
summary judgmentcredit facilitymortgageinterest rate dispute
Tags
summary judgmentcredit facilitymortgage bondbanking dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • a
  • s
  • e
  • w
  • a
  • s
  • d
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • c
  • i
  • v
  • i
  • l
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • c
  • e
  • d
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the respondents have a bona fide defence to the claim","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Dispute over amount owed and interest rate"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether summary judgment should be granted given the disputes","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents' admission of partial liability"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant bank extended a US$90,000 credit facility to the respondent company in December 2009, secured by mortgage bond and personal sureties. When the bank claimed US$101,677.93 was outstanding and sought summary judgment, the respondents disputed both the amount owed and the 60% interest rate claimed, arguing they owed only about US$78,000 and that interest should be 35-36%.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →