costs on ordinary scaleconsent judgmentpunitive costsprovisional order
Tags
costsconsent orderprovisional order
legislation
Statutes Cited
none quoted or interpreted
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether court should provide reasons for costs awarded by consent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Parties agreed to consent order including costs"}
{"issue_text":"Whether costs on ordinary scale were properly awarded","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"2nd and 3rd respondents prayed for costs in notice of opposition"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant had obtained a provisional order which was then set aside by consent of the parties. The 2nd and 3rd respondents, who were the victors, asked for reasons why costs were awarded on the ordinary scale rather than punitive scale.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases