Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Nickson Mande v The State

HH 104-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
15 February 2018
Citation
HH 104-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 104
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
FOROMA J
Full Bench
FOROMA J
Areas of Law
Criminal ProcedureBail Law
Keywords
RapeBail ApplicationSchedule 3 OffenceMedical EvidenceAbscondment Risk
Tags
BailSexual OffenceSchedule 3 Offence
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • No statute, chapter or section was expressly quoted or interpreted.
  • The court simply notes (without citation) that rape is a “schedule 3 offence” which, by implication, triggers the High Court’s exclusive bail jurisdiction under the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07].
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether compelling reasons exist to deny bail to applicant charged with schedule 3 offence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant unemployed, married, aged 30; medical evidence shows penetration; alleged abscondment to South Africa"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant presents flight risk warranting bail denial","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Alleged time spent in Durban November 2017-January 2018; applicant denies having passport"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, charged with rape (a schedule 3 offence), applied for bail after being remanded in custody. The State opposed bail citing abscondment risk, claiming the applicant fled to South Africa after the offence. Medical evidence showed definite penetration occurred between March-September 2017, with examination conducted 12 October 2017.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →