Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Nenyasha Housing Cooperative v John Chikandiwa and Joseph Chigaramashizha and Madhovi Fungayi and Saunyama Henry and Sheiby Maponga and Emmanuel Makase

HH 82-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
14 February 2018
Citation
HH 82-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 82
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
TAGU J
Full Bench
TAGU J
Areas of Law
Property lawCo-operative lawInterdicts
Keywords
Housing cooperativeInterdictCo-operative Societies ActGlaudina projectMembers' meetings
Tags
Housing cooperativeInterdictCo-operative societies
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Co-operative Societies Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Does this court have jurisdiction over disputes between cooperative and its members under s 115 of Co-operative Societies Act?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second and third respondents are members; first, fourth, fifth and sixth are not members"}
  • {"issue_text":"Should an interdict be granted against non-member respondents?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Non-members interfering with operations; holding unsanctioned meetings; obstructing development"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Nenyasha Housing Cooperative, owner of Glaudina project land, sought an interdict against six respondents for interfering with its operations. The respondents allegedly held unsanctioned meetings, presented themselves as representatives, and obstructed development work by contractor Shianxi Corporation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →