specific performancebreachinstalment salecancellationContractual Penalties Act
Tags
specific performanceagreement of salebreach of contractinstalment saleimmovable property
legislation
Statutes Cited
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
s
3
1
(
3
)
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
s
3
1
(
3
)
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
a
r
t
6
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
a
r
t
5
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
4
M
a
g
i
s
t
r
a
t
e
s
'
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
8
0
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
f
o
r
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
L
e
g
a
l
A
i
d
,
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
o
f
O
f
f
e
n
d
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
2
T
r
i
b
u
n
a
l
s
,
C
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
2
0
0
7
C
i
v
i
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
1
5
J
u
d
i
c
i
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
2
2
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
D
i
s
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
F
r
e
e
d
o
m
o
f
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
D
a
t
a
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
1
8
E
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
A
c
t
2
0
1
0
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant committed a breach which warranted termination of the agreement","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Payment schedule, amount paid in October 2018"}
{"issue_text":"Whether first respondent lawfully terminated the agreement pursuant to the alleged breach","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Notice requirements, Contractual Penalties Act compliance"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant is entitled to specific performance","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Breach finding, compliance with agreement"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought an order compelling the first respondent to transfer immovable property following a sale agreement. The dispute centered on whether the applicant had breached the agreement by failing to make timely instalment payments, and whether the respondent had validly cancelled the agreement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases