Civil ProcedureProperty LawLegal Professional Conduct
Keywords
rescissiondefault judgmentcosts de bonis propriisprofessional negligenceexecutrixcession of rights
Tags
rescission of judgmentcosts de bonis propriisprofessional negligenceexecutrix
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
-
n
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
w
e
r
e
c
i
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant's legal practitioner should bear costs de bonis propriis for proceeding with an application containing falsehoods despite warnings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant made false statements about when she became aware of judgment; Mr Diza persisted despite warnings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, in her capacity as executrix of the late Zivanai Madzinga's estate, sought condonation for late filing of rescission of a default judgment granted against Zivanai Madzinga. The judgment had been granted on 27 February 2008, but Zivanai had died on 18 January 2008 before the judgment was granted. The applicant made false statements about when she became aware of the judgment, claiming October 2009 when she had actually filed a rescission application in July 2008.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases